Referendum 71

I haven't really stayed in the loop on this honestly. I knew there was some movement to repeal the Washington Domestic Partner law, but I didn't follow the details. Until today.I just read that two gay rights groups have partnered together to publish the names of those who sign Referendum 71. Why? The article stated that these groups have done this in other states so that members of the groups can contact signers to "discuss" the issue.

What does "discussing" entail, I wonder. Are they going to wear rainbow hoods and burn triangles on my lawn.

I will go on record here as saying that I support traditional marriage, one man, one woman. Why? Because I believe that the institution of marriage was created by God, not by men and therefore cannot be changed. Regardless of what it is called, I don't believe God recognizes a same-sex "marriage." (Bring on the hate mail) BUT, I am concerned for civil rights of everyone in our country. I think people should be able to designate anyone they want to make medical decisions for them or receive their assets when they die. I oppose all forms of bashing, gay or otherwise. I can disagree with someone, even on fundamental issues about which I am passionate, and still show respect and seek justice for everyone.

I have alot of friends, who disagree with me on this issue. I can handle being friends with people I don't agree with. True discussions of conflicting viewpoints have been tremendously beneficial in my life. I have been challenged, educated and moved when I come to understand another's perspective. I think most of the people I'm friends with can handle diversity in relationships as well.

I may never have signed Ref. 71, mostly out of laziness. But just now I looked up the sponsoring organization and sent an email requesting a petition. Not out of hatred, but in defiance of the attempt to intimidate voters into silence. And I would be just as outraged if this were coming from the other side of the issue. If I learned that any cause I supported was treating the opposition this way, they would lose my support.

"Discussing" is one thing and you all know I never shy away from any "discussion" on any matter. I am curious, once my name lands on the list, however, what form this discussion will actually take. If I'm wrong and all I receive is respectful letters asking me to consider another viewpoint, then I'll eat my 10pt. Times New Roman words.

I have a feeling that this may actually backfire for these groups. I suspect there are alot of people like me who will not surrender our guaranteed right to express our opinions or to vote our consciences. I think publicizing the names will make their job alot harder, because I suspect this fear tactic will cause the list to grow, not shrink.